Luke 22:52-62
Today’s lectionary reading from Acts finishes up the martyrdom of St. Stephen, referenced in the previous post. It gives me an opportunity to go back to a point that didn’t exactly fit into that post.
As everyone learned in Sunday School, St. Stephen was the first Christian martyr, one of a long line of martyrs that provided plenty of material for paintings when one painted such things. Martyrdom introduces great drama into Christian history, but it’s not clear how well served we are by the narrative construct of martyrdom. Martyrdom also plays a big role in Islam, and I think most people would agree that the survival of the Islamic martyrdom idea or ideal into contemporary life bedevils us. I think the idea of martyrdom produces pathologies in Christianity as well, maybe in a subtler way. It takes the form of a persecution complex. There are constant complaints from some sectors of the Christian community in the
Of course, you can see why the idea of persecution is so attractive. Stephen’s story is paired with Luke’s account of Christ’s betrayal and arrest. Christ establishes a pattern for suffering at the hands of society. Isn’t martyrdom and suffering for the faith part of imitating Christ? Only in an unimaginative, literal-minded way. Fabricating persecution is so far from what Christ suffered. Christ’s role was singularly appointed, and his death achieved a specific purpose for humanity. No subsequent human death bears our sins away in that way. As the church becomes pervasive, Christian sacrifice takes on new forms. Like everything in the Bible, everyday applications require extrapolation from the stories to essential qualities of existence and experience.
3 comments:
David, the whole martyrdom concept is a fascinating one.
Would that it were valued [ and manifested] in the manner of charity and kindness-
By that, I refer to the honor attributed to those who give and act anonymously, purely for the pleasure of doing so.
Chaya,
Do you think it is useful to differentiate between martyrdom, dying for the cause, and other sorts of sacrifice? It seems to me acts of giving--which is defined by the giver, the recipient, and the thing the recipient receives--is different than martyrdom, which is all about what happens to the person being killed. Martyrdom is actually very sollipcistic. And of course a lot of contemporary martyrdom isn't about the martyr dying, but about whom the martyr can take out with him or her.
I am sure I'm going to get back to this. I don't think I'm done with it.
D
Oh, not done with it by a looong shot...
In wishing for a different 'valuing' [for lack of a better word, brain flatulence this am], I'm naively desiring to attribute a more 'noble' face to martyrdom than we're seeing currently.
Wishful thinking, D.
Post a Comment